<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Cutts Paid Links</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.weblinc.com/is-google-cutting-paid-links/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.weblinc.com/is-google-cutting-paid-links/</link>
	<description>Here you’ll get to know the WebLinc team and read about all sorts of interesting things. We’ll be talking about design, development, eCommerce, doing business online and much more. Please join in the discussion and get in touch with us any time at 1-215-925-1800.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 14:59:32 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://blog.weblinc.com/is-google-cutting-paid-links/comment-page-1/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 14:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.weblinc.com/is-google-cutting-paid-links/#comment-9</guid>
		<description>They currently overlook the paid links so the results are already skewed towards the money.  My position is that it is Google&#039;s responsibility to police their rankings not webmasters with their own interests acting as a secret police.  If Google cannot create an algorithm that produces meaningful &amp; significant natural rankings on their own, then perhaps Yahoo, MSN, AOL or Ask can.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They currently overlook the paid links so the results are already skewed towards the money.  My position is that it is Google&#8217;s responsibility to police their rankings not webmasters with their own interests acting as a secret police.  If Google cannot create an algorithm that produces meaningful &amp; significant natural rankings on their own, then perhaps Yahoo, MSN, AOL or Ask can.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart</title>
		<link>http://blog.weblinc.com/is-google-cutting-paid-links/comment-page-1/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 00:08:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.weblinc.com/is-google-cutting-paid-links/#comment-8</guid>
		<description>Your concerns are valid. But what would happen if they overlooked these paid links? Their results would become irrelevant and skew towards those with money. What would you do if you were Matt Cutts?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your concerns are valid. But what would happen if they overlooked these paid links? Their results would become irrelevant and skew towards those with money. What would you do if you were Matt Cutts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
